Compare
Normalised product comparison
Put products side by side. Issuers publish fees, yields and redemption terms in different formats, so every figure here has been converted to the same basis first. Rows are grouped into economics, liquidity, access and regulation, infrastructure, and how well sourced the data is.
Normalised comparison
As of 29 Aug 2026
Protos
PRTS· Protos
Identity
Ticker
PRTS
Issuer
Asset class
Equity
Product structure
Tokenized Fund
Underlying asset
Cryptocurrency Quantitative Trading Fund
Launched
01 Oct 2017
Economics
Yield
0.00%
Yield basis
No yield
Expense ratio
2.00%
Yield net of fee
0.00%
AUM
$8.0M
25D AUM change
-
NAV per token
1.2000 USD
Base currency
USD
Weighted average maturity
0d
Liquidity
Redemption frequency
Quarterly
Dealing cut-off
30 days prior
Settlement
T+15
Redemption fee
None
Secondary venues
None
Access & regulation
Investor eligibility
AccreditedInstitutional
Minimum investment
$0
Available in
CHEUSG
Prohibited
US
Issuer jurisdiction
Switzerland
Fund domicile
CH
Legal structure
Luxembourg Part II Fund
Allow-list required
Yes
Transfer restrictions
KYC required.
Infrastructure
Networks
1
Custodian
Administrator
Transfer agent
Tokenization platform
Oracle / attestation
None
Highlighted cells mark the most favourable value on rows where a single direction is unambiguously better (higher yield, lower fee, lower minimum, faster redemption, shorter maturity, greater scale, better coverage). Rows marked * carry a caveat: hover the label. Yields quoted on different bases are not directly comparable; product structure changes what you legally own. This is data, not a recommendation.